Gauging serious interest in a CNC Alloy lower. - Page 103
Join Today
Page 103 of 103 FirstFirst ... 353939899100101102103
Results 1,021 to 1,026 of 1026
Like Tree364Likes

Thread: Gauging serious interest in a CNC Alloy lower.

  1. #1021
    Forum Lurker
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    10
    definitely interested in a 556 lower

  2. #1022
    Forum Lurker
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    9
    Same here.

  3. #1023
    Forum Lurker
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    23
    I'd take 2x 556 lowers

  4. Remove Advertisements
    ACRForum.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #1024
    Wise Member mpow66m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    1,921
    ill take 1 556 lower
    ''He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one.'' - Luke 22:36.

    ''The only way to truly hurt a man is to take away everything that he valued and degrade it and remind him of it every day of his life. BUT by doing this you also create a monster and you will regret ever harming that man because he will be your greatest horror.''



  6. #1025
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    344
    Wait is this thing alive again?
    Owner, Infidel Automatics
    Type 07 FFL
    Addis, LA

  7. #1026
    Full Member 68fbjjz109's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Detroit Metro
    Posts
    625
    It's never really been dead. Just alot going on.

    Work stuff, baby stuff, mustang stuff, carbon fiber mustang stuff ect.

    Got the 7.62x39 Bolt functional again. Not only did I get to the range, but I got the mustang back together for the track, and zero issues all the way around.






    On the ACR side this was a huge relief, as performance was degraded for some time in spite the most accurate prototype(v2) that has ever been fitted, being used. V3 lower and v2 catch is near complete and will be sent out Wednesday, however I wanted to run the V2 with the bolt corrected before making any changes.

    I am hoping the V2 catch will alleviate the steel mag not fully seating, as it's developed more recent feeding issues which is separate from the extractor/bolt issues. I don't have any issues with the P mag which is primary consideration for the lower, or the Tapco, however it would be ideal to be able to use all mags if needed in a pinch.

    The AK lower is being used to prove out all the interface points, and the StanAg lower will then be done to reflect all the changes.

    If you didn't see it earlier in the thread, if cost's are too high to internalize, a consideration is to crowd fund it.
    Last edited by 68fbjjz109; 04-24-2017 at 04:34 PM.
    xPolecatx and HibikiR like this.


 

Remove Ads

Similar Threads

  1. Metal lower
    By rha1211 in forum ACR Technical Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-11-2013, 08:39 PM
  2. ACR Alloy Lower
    By Trip5896 in forum ACR General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 08:13 PM
  3. AR-15 Lower
    By Jaredxtool in forum General Firearms
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-24-2012, 04:51 PM
  4. TOS thread to gauge alloy lower interest
    By solidius in forum ACR General Discussion
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-23-2011, 10:29 AM
  5. SCAR interest....
    By Sentll in forum General Firearms
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 09-18-2011, 08:42 PM

Search tags for this page

2013 remington acr
,
acr aluminum lower receiver
,
acr lower receiver
,

acr solidwork

,

aluminum acr lower

,
alumium acr lower
,
bushmaster acr upper
,
mpow66m race car
,
polymer lower failures
,
short 5 round magazine
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •